The home secretary has denied the government is watering down its response to child grooming gangs after it was accused of dropping plans for local inquiries. Yvette Cooper announced at the beginning of the year that «victim-centred, locally-led inquiries» would take place in five areas after the issue caught the attention of tech billionaire Elon Musk. But this week, safeguarding minister Jess Phillips did not provide an update on the reviews and instead said local authorities would be able to access a £5m fund to support any work they wanted to carry out. Her statement led to accusations that the government was diluting the importance of the local inquiries by giving councils the choice over how to spend the money. Asked by Anna Jones on Sky News whether the government was «watering down» its response, Ms Cooper said: «No, completely the opposite. What we’re doing is increasing the action we’re taking on this vile crime.» The home secretary pointed to the rapid audit that is being carried out by Baroness Louise Casey, which will bring together the data gathered so far on grooming gangs and consider the lessons that should be learned at a national level. She added: «Most important of all, what we’re doing is we’re increasing the police investigations, because these are dangerous perpetrators and again, they should be behind bars.» Demands for a national inquiry into the scandal – in which girls as young as 11 were groomed and raped across a number of towns and cities in England over a decade ago – grew louder this year after Mr Musk accused Labour of failing to act on the issue on his social media platform X. The government refused to hold a national inquiry, citing the work carried out by Professor Alexis Jay, who led the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse that looked into abuse by organised groups following multiple convictions of sexual offences against children across the UK between 2010-2014. However, it did commit to holding local inquiries in five areas backed by £5m in funding and advised by Tom Crowther KC. ‘Political mess’ But ministers are facing a backlash following Ms Phillips’ statement in the Commons on Tuesday – made an hour before parliament rose for Easter recess – in which she said the government would take a «flexible approach» by allowing five councils to launch victims’ panels or locally led audits. One Labour MP told Sky News the issue had turned into a «political mess» and that they were being called «grooming sympathisers». On the update from Ms Phillips on Tuesday, they said it might have been the «right thing to do» but that it was «horrible politically.» «We are all getting so much abuse. It’s just political naivety in the extreme.» Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said yesterday that she was «absolutely astonished that Labour has dropped what it said it would do in January.» «They are clearly uncomfortable with having inquiries that are looking into this issue,» she said. «They said that they’ll have a pot of money for councils to bid in, but why would a council bid for money to investigate itself? «We need something that is national. We need a statutory inquiry so we can compel witnesses, and I’m going to make sure that we force another vote.» ‘We will leave no stone unturned’ Ms Phillips later defended her decision, saying there was «far too much party political misinformation about the action that is being taken when everyone should be trying to support victims and survivors.» «We are funding new police investigations to re-open historic cases, providing national support for locally led inquiries and action, and Louise Casey… is currently reviewing the nature, scale and ethnicity of grooming gangs offending across the country. «We will not hesitate to go further, unlike the previous government, who showed no interest in this issue over 14 years and did nothing to progress the recommendations from the seven year national inquiry when they had the chance. «We will leave no stone unturned in pursuit of justice for victims and will be unrelenting in our crackdown on sick predators and perpetrators who prey on vulnerable children.»
SOURCE
